Monday, November 26, 2007

Lead Distribution - Lead Management Architecture

Leadorganizer and Lead Management software , we talk about linear lead flow process in our first post and in second post we talk about Lead Generation and Lead Acquisition and Distribution as lead managment software. To continue our talk about leadorganizer and lead management software with reference to our lead flow, we talk about Marketing & Sales Operations and also Communications and Analytics as important part of leadorganizer and lead management flow.

Today we are going to talk about Lead Distribution as part of leadorganizer and lead management software architecture or lead flow.


Lead Distribution

As larger vendors work with partner organizations such as distributors (see distribution (business)), resellers, brokers and other channel partners, those vendors often distribute leads to their respective partners to provide a local contact to those prospects and also 'feed' partners with new business opportunities. Today there are two major methods for distributing sales leads to partners: Push or Pull.


PUSH The push method sends leads to specific partners assuming that those partners will follow up and work on those leads. The challenge with 'push' is the fact that oftentimes the local sales people may not be able to react immediately for various reasons: not available, busy, on vacation... Many large vendors report disappointment when asked about their lead follow-up rate through partners after the leads where pushed out to those partners.

Pull The pull method was invented and patented by a German Engineer, Axel Schultze, who was frustrated with the lead follow up results of the push method and decided to let the available and motivated sales people 'pull' leads from an online available system. Patent was granted by the US Patent Office in May 2006. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&S1=09514997&OS=09514997&RS=09514997


The pull method became widely accepted in the high tech industry where thousands of resellers from companies including Avaya, Nortel, Juniper and others distributed leads that way. The PULL Method became superior over the PUSH method, and lead closure rates grew on average by 300% as white papers from BlueRoads indicate.


Ref: Lead Distribution Software, wikipedia

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I like your blog. you have presented nice way.

Anonymous said...

Hi,
I like to read your blog on Lead Management Architecture. I love to read about Lead Distribution as a part of Lead Management Architecture. I like your post on LeadOrganizer and Lead Management Software.

Lee said...

Hello,
I like your blog on Leadorganizer and Lead Management Architecture. I do believe in your statement what you say that Marketing & Sales Operations and also Communications and Analytics are importance key of leadorganizer and lead management flow. I like your post on Lead Distribution on Lead Management Architecture as a part of Leadorganizer.

Unknown said...

Hello,
Your blog on Lead Distribution as a part of Leadorganizer and Lead Management Architecture is very nice. I also like to visit http://www.leadorganizer.net/ too for Lead Management & Leadorgnizer Software. I like your post on Lead Distribution.

Pari said...

Hi friend4all,

You know as I read your blog Lead Distribution - Lead Management Architecture, it seems like you are giving learning study for that. As if you are teaching your reader all your knowledge about it. That would be very perfect. So I know in your website: http://www.leadorganizer.net/. Everything is possible. Keep up your nice work.

Anonymous said...

Whatever method is being used in lead distribution, I would still suggest the use of a software or a lead manager that will help you determine where to assign your leads. Not all salespeople can actually handle a wide variety of leads, and you don't want to risk the possibility of a wasted lead.